Much of Chapter 6 discusses the agents of socialization
which are the social structures in which socialization occurs (161), specifically
within the school setting. Of the topics
explored throughout the chapter, I thought the idea of streaming was really
interesting. According to the text, streaming is refers to the series of
courses a student should take that best match their abilities and aptitudes
(167) however as I reflect back on my high school experience, I feel as though
no teacher correctly guided me towards taking courses that were appropriately
challenging for me.
I am a product of the pre-calculus math curriculum. Was this
course appropriately challenging for me?... probably not, especially since I
took math every semester in high school (not by choice). There are a few reasons to why I think I did
not want to transfer into a more applied math stream (169) each time I
unsuccessfully completed the course. The first reason is that I did not want to
admit failure; I am a competitive person, so naturally I have too much pride to
admit defeat. Secondly, no teacher ever gave me any advice on what an
appropriate stream was for me. Lastly, and most importantly, there was a social
stigma (171) associated with taking consumer math. I remember thinking about how
many of the students in the consumer math classes is what I perceived as the “deviants”
(184) and I most definitely did not want to be associated with this social
grouping (172) or risk change in my social identity (183). In hindsight, I
realize how ridiculous this sounds however as a future educator I need to be
mindful of the influence that the opinions of students peers have on their
decisions.
Discussion Question: How to we ensure that we adequately and
appropriately guide and challenge our students while also ensuring that we
are respectful of the effect that our influence can have on a students’ social
identity?
No comments:
Post a Comment